Reviewer Guidelines
Join our distinguished community of peer reviewers and help maintain the highest standards of academic publishing. Your expertise shapes the future of scholarly communication.
Why Review for RSYN PRESS?
Join a community of distinguished scholars making a real impact on academic publishing
Recognition
Annual reviewer recognition and certificates
Networking
Connect with leading researchers globally
Early Access
First look at cutting-edge research
Development
Enhance your academic skills
The Role of a Reviewer
As a peer reviewer, you are part of a community dedicated to advancing scholarly knowledge and maintaining academic integrity.
Your Impact
Your constructive, honest, and timely feedback helps authors improve their work and assists our editors in making informed publication decisions. You shape the future of academic discourse in your field.
Professional Growth
Reviewing manuscripts keeps you at the forefront of research developments, improves your own writing, and builds valuable professional connections within the academic community.
Quality Assurance
You serve as a guardian of academic quality, ensuring that published research meets the highest standards of methodology, originality, and scholarly contribution.
Review Process Steps
A comprehensive guide to our peer review workflow
Invitation & Acceptance
Receive review invitation via email with manuscript details. Consider your expertise, availability, and potential conflicts of interest before accepting.
Check Expertise
Does the manuscript align with your research area?
Assess Availability
Can you complete within 3-4 weeks?
Check Conflicts
Any personal or professional conflicts?
Initial Reading & Assessment
Conduct an initial read-through to understand the manuscript's scope, methodology, and contribution to the field.
Key Questions to Consider:
- โข Is the research question clearly defined and significant?
- โข Are the methods appropriate and well-described?
- โข Do the conclusions follow from the results?
- โข Is the writing clear and well-organized?
Detailed Review & Documentation
Conduct thorough evaluation and document your findings using our structured review format.
For Authors
- โข Constructive feedback
- โข Specific suggestions
- โข Clear recommendations
For Editors
- โข Confidential comments
- โข Final recommendation
- โข Quality assessment
Submit Review & Follow-up
Submit your comprehensive review through our system and be available for clarifications if needed.
Review Report Structure
Follow this comprehensive template for effective reviews
1 Executive Summary
- โข Brief overview of the manuscript's aims
- โข Summary of main findings and conclusions
- โข Your overall assessment (2-3 sentences)
- โข Recommendation preview
2 Strengths & Weaknesses
- โข Major strengths of the work
- โข Significant weaknesses or limitations
- โข Overall contribution to the field
- โข Novelty and originality assessment
3 Detailed Comments
- โข Numbered, specific comments
- โข Methodology and design issues
- โข Data analysis and interpretation
- โข Writing clarity and organization
4 Technical Assessment
- โข Statistical methods appropriateness
- โข Data quality and sufficiency
- โข Figures and tables evaluation
- โข Reference completeness and accuracy
5 Recommendations
6 Confidential Editor Comments
- โข Concerns not shared with authors
- โข Detailed reasoning for recommendation
- โข Suggestions for editorial decision
- โข Priority level assessment
Ethical Responsibilities
Upholding the highest standards of academic integrity
Confidentiality
The review process is strictly confidential. Manuscripts and related materials must never be shared, discussed, or used for personal research purposes.
Objectivity
Reviews must be conducted objectively, free from personal bias. Focus on the research merit, not personal opinions about authors or institutions.
Constructive Feedback
Provide professional, courteous feedback aimed at improving the manuscript. Personal criticism or unprofessional language is never acceptable.
Timeliness
Complete reviews within the agreed timeframe. If delays are unavoidable, notify the editorial office immediately to avoid holding up the publication process.
Conflict Disclosure
Immediately disclose any conflicts of interest, including personal, professional, or financial relationships that could bias your review.
Research Integrity
Report any suspected misconduct, including plagiarism, data fabrication, or ethical violations, to the editorial office immediately.
Reviewer Resources
Tools and support to help you provide excellent reviews
Review Template
Download our structured review template to ensure comprehensive evaluation
Download TemplateReady to Join Our Reviewer Community?
Become part of our distinguished network of peer reviewers and help shape the future of academic publishing in your field.